Government Pension Fund Global

About Government Pension Fund Global

Policy assessment

0%

Social media

Bank's Policy

Animal Farming & Food Production
0%

Assessed policy

Extract of the policy that covers, or comes closest to covering this criterium

Recommendation from the Finance Committee on the Government Pension Fund
(…) «other particularly serious violations of basic ethical norms» in the GPFG’s ethical guidelines(…). The Committee cites breaches of animal welfare, including the unjustifiable transport of animals to be slaughtered (…) as examples of cases that may fall under this criterion.

Comments on score: not covered

Assessed policy

Extract of the policy that covers, or comes closest to covering this criterium

not covered

Comments on score: not covered

Assessed policy

Extract of the policy that covers, or comes closest to covering this criterium

not covered

Comments on score: not covered

Assessed policy

Extract of the policy that covers, or comes closest to covering this criterium

not covered

Comments on score: not covered

Assessed policy

Extract of the policy that covers, or comes closest to covering this criterium

not covered

Comments on score: not covered

Assessed policy

Extract of the policy that covers, or comes closest to covering this criterium

not covered

Comments on score: not covered

Assessed policy

Extract of the policy that covers, or comes closest to covering this criterium

not covered

Comments on score: not covered

Assessed policy

Extract of the policy that covers, or comes closest to covering this criterium

not covered

Comments on score: not covered

Assessed policy

Extract of the policy that covers, or comes closest to covering this criterium

not covered

Comments on score: not covered

Assessed policy

Extract of the policy that covers, or comes closest to covering this criterium

not covered

Comments on score: not covered

Assessed policy

Extract of the policy that covers, or comes closest to covering this criterium

not covered

Comments on score: not covered

Assessed policy

Extract of the policy that covers, or comes closest to covering this criterium

Recommendation from the Finance Committee on the Government Pension Fund
(…) «other particularly serious violations of basic ethical norms» in the GPFG’s ethical guidelines(…). The Committee cites breaches of animal welfare, including the unjustifiable transport of animals to be slaughtered (…) as examples of cases that may fall under this criterion.

Comments on score: not covered

Assessed policy

Extract of the policy that covers, or comes closest to covering this criterium

not covered

Comments on score: not covered

Assessed policy

Extract of the policy that covers, or comes closest to covering this criterium

not covered

Comments on score: not covered

Assessed policy

Extract of the policy that covers, or comes closest to covering this criterium

not covered

Comments on score: not covered

Assessed policy

Extract of the policy that covers, or comes closest to covering this criterium

not covered

Comments on score: not covered

Assessed policy

Extract of the policy that covers, or comes closest to covering this criterium

not covered

Comments on score: not covered

Assessed policy

Extract of the policy that covers, or comes closest to covering this criterium

not covered

Comments on score: not covered

Assessed policy

Extract of the policy that covers, or comes closest to covering this criterium

not covered

Comments on score: not covered

Assessed policy

Extract of the policy that covers, or comes closest to covering this criterium

not covered

Comments on score: not covered

Assessed policy

Extract of the policy that covers, or comes closest to covering this criterium

not covered

Comments on score: not covered

Assessed policy

Extract of the policy that covers, or comes closest to covering this criterium

not covered

Comments on score: not covered

Animal Testing
0%

Assessed policy

Extract of the policy that covers, or comes closest to covering this criterium

not covered

Comments on score: not covered

Assessed policy

Extract of the policy that covers, or comes closest to covering this criterium

not covered

Comments on score: not covered

Assessed policy

Extract of the policy that covers, or comes closest to covering this criterium

not covered

Comments on score: not covered

Assessed policy

Extract of the policy that covers, or comes closest to covering this criterium

not covered

Comments on score: not covered

Assessed policy

Extract of the policy that covers, or comes closest to covering this criterium

not covered

Comments on score: not covered

Assessed policy

Extract of the policy that covers, or comes closest to covering this criterium

not covered

Comments on score: not covered

Pets, Entertainment and Fashion
0%

Assessed policy

Extract of the policy that covers, or comes closest to covering this criterium

not covered

Comments on score: not covered

Assessed policy

Extract of the policy that covers, or comes closest to covering this criterium

not covered

Comments on score: not covered

Assessed policy

Extract of the policy that covers, or comes closest to covering this criterium

not covered

Comments on score: not covered

Assessed policy

Extract of the policy that covers, or comes closest to covering this criterium

not covered

Comments on score: not covered

Assessed policy

Extract of the policy that covers, or comes closest to covering this criterium

not covered

Comments on score: not covered

Assessed policy

Extract of the policy that covers, or comes closest to covering this criterium

not covered

Comments on score: not covered

Assessed policy

Extract of the policy that covers, or comes closest to covering this criterium

not covered

Comments on score: not covered

Assessed policy

Extract of the policy that covers, or comes closest to covering this criterium

not covered

Comments on score: not covered

Governance
0%

Assessed policy

Extract of the policy that covers, or comes closest to covering this criterium

not covered

Comments on score: not covered

Assessed policy

Extract of the policy that covers, or comes closest to covering this criterium

not covered

Comments on score: not covered

Assessed policy

Extract of the policy that covers, or comes closest to covering this criterium

not covered

Comments on score: not covered

Assessed policy

Extract of the policy that covers, or comes closest to covering this criterium

not covered

Comments on score: not covered

Assessed policy

Extract of the policy that covers, or comes closest to covering this criterium

not covered

Comments on score: not covered

Assessed policy

Extract of the policy that covers, or comes closest to covering this criterium

Sustainable investments:
Responsible investment is an integral part of the fund’s investment strategy. Our aim is to identify long-term investment opportunities and reduce the fund’s exposure to unacceptable risks.
(…)
We aim to identify long-term investment opportunities and reduce our exposure to unacceptable risks. We assess how companies impact on the environment and society and see opportunities in companies that enable more environmentally friendly economic activity. There are also companies we choose not to invest in for sustainability or ethical reasons.

Comments on score: The fund invests in companies that enable more environmentally friendly economic activity. It does not specifically mention animal welfare or food systems

Go back to ranking list